Saturday, April 21, 2012

The Trinitarian Experience by Fred Sanders


“Come, Christian Triune God Who Lives” (Francis Schaeffer)

Listen to Francis Schaeffer’s words from his 1972 book True Spirituality. In the chapter entitled “The Supernatural Universe” he says:

Little by little, many Christians in this generation find the reality slipping away. The reality tends to get covered by the barnacles of naturalistic thought. Indeed, I suppose this is one of half a dozen questions that are most often presented to me by young people from Christian backgrounds: where is the reality? Where has the reality gone? I have heard it spoken in honest, open desperation by fine young Christians in many countries. As the ceiling of the naturalistic comes down upon us, as it invades by injection or by connotation, reality gradually slips away.

Schaeffer was in earnest about this cry for reality. He was not just reporting the “honest, open desperation” of “fine young Christians” who came to him in the early seventies; he had also asked these questions himself, in almost the same language, twenty years before. In the very next sentence he gives the answer as he had found it:

But the fact that Christ as the Bridegroom brings forth fruit through me as the bride, through the agency of the indwelling Holy Spirit by faith ““this fact opens the way for me as a Christian to begin to know in the present life the reality of the supernatural. This is where the Christian is to live. Doctrine is important, but it is not an end in itself. There is to be an experiential reality, moment by moment. (True Spirituality, from Schaeffer’s Works volume III, p. 264)

It would be easy to overlook one of the most important elements in this answer: the Trinitarian element. The road to spiritual reality, according to Schaeffer, is through an experienced reality of God, but specifically of the fact “that Christ “¦ brings forth fruit through me “¦ through the agency of the indwelling Holy Spirit.” The reality Schaeffer invites us to understand and experience is a trinitarian reality, an experience of God the Father through the Son and the Spirit. And the God who Schaeffer points to in all his most popular writings, the God who is there and is not silent, is not God in general, but God the Holy Trinity. Schaeffer goes on, becoming more insistently trinitarian as he develops the thought:

This experiential result, however, is not just an experience of “bare” supernaturalism, without content, without our being able to describe and communicate it. It is much more. It is a moment-by-moment, increasing, experiential relationship to Christ and to the whole Trinity. We are to be in a relationship with the whole Trinity. The doors are open now: the intellectual doors, and also the doors to reality. (True Spirituality, Works III:264)

Schaeffer attributes his effectiveness in later ministry to his encounter with the Trinity. In his 1974 position paper for the Lausanne congress on evangelization, Schaeffer tells the story of the deep period of doubt and perplexity in his life in 1951 and 1952. Troubled by the lack of spiritual reality in the Christian groups he worked with, Schaeffer began asking why. He thought his way all the way back to his original agnosticism, and put all of his beliefs and commitments back on the table for re-negotiation. He paced back and forth for months, or took long walks when the weather permitted. He notified his wife Edith that if he didn’t find what he needed in Christianity, he would reject it and then do something else with his life. His conclusion:

I came to realize that indeed I had been right in becoming a Christian. But then I went on further and wrestled deeper and asked, “But then where is the spiritual reality, Lord, among most of that which calls itself orthodoxy?” And gradually I found something. I found something that I had not been taught, a simple thing but profound. I discovered the meaning of the work of Christ, the meaning of the blood of Christ, moment by moment in our lives after we are Christians “the moment-by-moment work of the whole Trinity in our lives because as Christians we are indwelt by the Holy Spirit. That is true spirituality.” (III:416-417).

Writing about this turning point in his life, Schaeffer later said: “Gradually the sun came out and the song came. Interestingly enough, although I had written no poetry for many years, in that time of joy and song I found poetry beginning to flow again “¦ admittedly, as poetry it is very poor, but it expressed a song in my heart which was wonderful to me.” (preface to True Spirituality, Works III:196). And there is a bit of poetry, first published in 1960 and later reprinted in the preface to 1974′s No Little People, which captures what Schaeffer was seeking and what he found:

To eat, to breathe
to beget
Is this all there is
Chance configuration of atom against atom
of god against god
I cannot believe it.
Come, Christian Triune God who lives,
Here am I
Shake the world again.

“The Christian Triune God who lives” did answer that prayer, and shook the world through Schaeffer’s ministry. 

Trinitarian Salvation according to Francis Schaeffer

In 1951, Francis Schaeffer had an encounter with the Trinity that revolutionized his life. I wrote about that discovery in “’Come, Christian Triune God Who Lives’ (Francis Schaeffer).” It sparked the phase of his ministry that we all remember him for, and put him in touch with a sense of spiritual reality he had lacked before: “a moment-by-moment, increasing, experiential relationship to Christ and to the whole Trinity. We are to be in a relationship with the whole Trinity.”

But when this change came over him, he didn’t sit down and write a treatise on the Trinity; instead, he famously started writing about everything else under the sun. As a result, if you want the details of Schaeffer’s trinitarian view of salvation (his soteriology), you have to piece it together from a few places scattered around his writings. The most programmatic statement of Schaeffer’s Trinitarian soteriology is in his book True Spirituality (also reprinted in Vol. III of the Collected Works, p. 270-271). He connects the dots this way:

“¦the Holy Spirit indwelling the individual Christian is not only the agent of Christ, but he is also the agent of the Father. Consequently, when I accept Christ as my Savior, my guilt is gone, I am indwelt by the Holy Spirit, and I am in communication with the Father and the Son, as well as of the Holy Spirit ““the entire Trinity. Thus now, in the present life, if I am justified, I am in a personal relationship with each of the members of the Trinity. God the Father is my Father; I am in union with the Son; and I am indwelt by the Holy Spirit. This is not just meant to be doctrine; it is what I have now. (True Spirituality; Works III:271)

If you want even more detail on trinitarian salvation, you have to follow Schaeffer into the land of direct, personal Bible study. His basic course in Bible knowledge has been published as the series Basic Bible Studies (found in the Collected Works, Vol. II, pp. 325ff). The striking simplicity of these studies is underlined by the direct appeal Schaeffer makes to the reader:

It would be my advice that each time you do these studies, you speak to God and ask Him to give you understanding through the use of the bible and the study together. If someone pursues these studies who does not believe that God exists, I would suggest that you say aloud in the quietness of your room: “O God, if there is a God, I want to know whether You exist. And I ask You that I may be willing to bow before You if You do exist.” (Works, II:323)

What else would you expect from a Christian writer whose message was summed up in the affirmation, “He is there, and He is not silent”?

“Have Clearly In Mind the Facts Concerning the Trinity”

According to Schaeffer, every Christian who wanted to understand salvation and the Christian life was obligated to come to grips with the biblical revelation on the subject: “It is central and important to our Christian faith to have clearly in mind the facts concerning the Trinity.” His Basic Bible Studies were designed to deliver those facts.

The first point in Schaeffer’s Bible study on the Trinity is that the God of the Bible is personal: God has plans which he considers in advance and then carries out with purpose (Eph. 1:4). Not only does he think but he takes action, real action in space and time (Gen. 1:1). And not only does he think and act, but he feels. He loves the world (John 3:16). “Love is an emotion. Thus the God who exists is personal. He thinks, acts, and feels, three distinguishing marks of personality. He is not an impersonal force, nor an all-inclusive everything. He is personal. When He speaks to us, He says “I” and we can answer Him “You.”

One of Schaeffer’s favorite phrases for the personhood of God was that he was “personal on the high order of Trinity,” and the next step in his basic trinitarian Bible study is to state all the biblical evidence about unity and diversity in the God of the Bible. The Old Testament teaches, and the New Testament reaffirms, that there is only one God (Deut. 6:4; James 2:19). “But,” Schaeffer goes on, “the Bible also teaches that this one God exists in three distinct persons.” His first line of evidence for this claim is the divine plurals used in the language of the Old Testament: “Who will go for us” (Isa. 6:8), “Let us make man in our image” (Gen. 1:26), “Let us go down and confuse their language” (Gen. 11:7). “In this verse, as in in 1:26, the persons of the Trinity are in communication with each other.”

These Old Testament plurals, it seems to me, would not be enough to prove the Triunity of the one God all by themselves. They are odd enough to require some explanation: Why would a consistently monotheistic revelation use words like we, us, and ours? And they might point to a certain fullness or richness of God’s inner life. But solid trinitarianism has to wait until the Son and the Spirit are directly revealed in the events of the New Testament. What Schaeffer primarily wants us to learn from these passages, however, is not triunity itself but the fact that it pre-exists creation. Combined with a few New Testament insights (“you loved me before the foundation of the world,” said Jesus to his Father in John 17:24), these plurals show that “Communication and love existed between the persons of the Trinity before the creation.” And that matters a lot to Schaeffer, because it means that when God reveals himself as Father, Son, and Spirit, he is revealing who has always been.

When he turns to the New Testament, Schaeffer highlights the baptism of Christ (Matt. 3:16-17) because of the clarity with which each of the three persons is shown there. He also points to a few of the passages where all three persons are named in a single verse: Matt. 28:19; John 15:26; I Peter 1:2.

With this biblical doctrine of God as his foundation, Schaeffer’s soteriology is explicitly trinitarian. Under the heading of salvation, the Trinity is not the very first thing Schaeffer teaches. That priority is reserved for a classic Protestant statement of the biblical doctrine of salvation by grace alone through faith alone. But from that all-important point of entry, the very next thing Schaeffer wants to say is that what this justification introduces us into is a new relationship, or web of relationships, to the Triune God:

This new relationship with the triune God is, then, the second of the blessings of salvation, justification being the first. This new relationship, as we have seen, is threefold:
1. God the Father is the Christian’s Father.
2. The only begotten Son of God is our Savior and Lord, our prophet, priest and king. We are identified and united with Him.
3. The Holy Spirit lives in us and deals with us. He communicates to us the manifold benefits of redemption.
In summary, commenting on 2 Cor 13:14, Schaeffer says “The work of each of the three persons is important to us. Jesus died to save us, the Father draws us to Himself and loves us, and the Holy Spirit deals with us.”

Moment by Moment Christian Experience

After the believer is placed in a saving relationship with the persons of the Triune God, three consequences follow: (1) Relationship to brothers and sisters in the church, (2) assurance of salvation, and (3) a Christian life characterized by the process of sanctification. In these studies, Schaeffer devotes several sections to sanctification, equipping his readers with a good survey of the things they will need to know to live an intelligent Christian life. He highlights the difference between the event of justification and the process of sanctification, which is “a flowing stream involving the past”¦, the present, and into the future.” Salvation, as he had said In True Spirituality, “is a single piece, and yet a flowing stream.” Schaeffer also rounds out his teaching on sanctification with a great deal of practical advice about how Christians are to deal with sin, and an introduction to the basic spiritual disciplines.

True to trinitarian form, though, one of the main things Schaeffer wants to say is that sanctification is a project of the entire Trinity, and he does so by surveying the way each of the three persons is related to Christian holiness:

God the Father is active in our sanctification as the one who will accomplish it, and who sets the standard of it: “May the God of peace himself sanctify you” and “equip you with everything good that you may do his will, working in you what is pleasing in his sight.” (I Thess. 5:23; Hebrews 13:20-21). Elsewhere (in True Spirituality, Works III:275) Schaeffer says, “When we accept Christ as our Savior, we are immediately in a new relationship with God the Father. “¦ but, of course, if this is so, we should be experiencing in this life the Father’s fatherliness.”

God the Son is involved in our sanctification in that it is the purpose for which he died: “Christ gave himself for the church, that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word”¦ gave himself to redeem us from all lawlessness and to purify for himself a people for his own possession who are zealous for good works.” (Ephesians 5:25-26; Titus 2:11-14)

God the Spirit is the holy one who makes us holy: “you were washed, you were sanctified”¦by the Spirit of our God”¦ and are being transformed from glory to glory”¦ by the Lord who is the Spirit “¦ and we are saved through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.” (I Cor 6:11; II Cor 3:18; II Thess 2:13)

“Never Mechanical and Not Primarily Legal”

Most of this richly trinitarian understanding of salvation recedes into the background of Schaeffer’s writing. Outside of the Basic Bible Studies, he does not often work through the details of trinitarian soteriology. But Schaeffer always spoke from a depth of insight that flowed from his 1951 experience of the reality of the Trinity in salvation. He wrote and spoke with a sense of God’s presence that was deeply personal, and which he did manage to communicate to sympathetic listeners in all that he taught after 1951. Schaeffer’s trinitarian awakening left its mark on his work in the strong sense of the personhood of God that colored all his expressions. It may be hard for evangelical Christians to hear the phrase “a relationship with God” as a radically trinitarian claim, but that is how the language functioned for Schaeffer. Whenever he said “relationship,” you can bet there was trinitarianism ringing in his ears: “Our relationship is never mechanical and not primarily legal. It is personal and vital. God the Father is my Father; I am united and identified with God the Son; God the Holy Spirit dwells within me. The Bible tells us that this threefold relationship is a present fact, just as it tells us that justification and Heaven are facts.”

Of course, as the story of Schaeffer’s 1951 trinitarian awakening makes clear, not every Christian is aware of the trinitarian depths waiting beneath their spiritual lives. “It is,” Schaeffer warned, “possible to be a Christian and yet not take advantage of what our vital relationship with the three persons of the Trinity should mean in living a Christian life. We must first intellectually realize the fact of our vital relationship with the triune God and then in faith begin to act upon that realization.” And immediately after this warning, he invited his readers to review the Basic Bible Study on the three new relationships that constitute the Christian life.


The Tri-Universe by Dr. Henry M. Morris


In a previous Back to Genesis article, "The Wonderful Truth of the Trinity" (Acts & Facts, November 2005), the Biblical doctrine of the tri-une God (or Trinity) was briefly expounded in terms of some of the key verses of Scripture teaching it. A comprehensive treatment was obviously impossible in three pages (entire books have been written on this subject), but at least the essential truth was presented, namely that the God of Creation is one God, in three Persons—Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

This is arguably the most important doctrine of Christianity—certainly the most distinctive. This does not mean that there are three Gods; there is only one God who created Heaven and Earth and everything in them. The term "God" as used in the Bible most commonly refers to the Father, but the Son and the Holy Spirit are each also recognized as God. This concept is so difficult for many to accept that some have argued that the three divine Persons are not really three distinct individuals but merely three modes in which the one God can express Himself as occasion demands.

But this also is a false invention. There are many accounts of the Father and Son and Holy Spirit speaking to each other, for example. The doctrine of the Trinity is admittedly difficult (in fact impossible) to comprehend fully with our minds, but it is taught so definitely in God's Word that we believe it with our hearts.

Skeptics can deride the Trinity doctrine as mathematically impossible. One plus One plus One does not equal One, but three. Nevertheless, the Bible reveals God to be a Trinity—one God in three Persons. Are we naïve and credulous to believe such a thing?

Well, not really. It is also a remarkable fact that the divine Trinity, the tri-une God, has created a great universe which is itself a trinity, with each of its three components also structured as trinities. This would not necessarily prove that God is a Trinity, but it is a fact that needs explanation. Could God have created it as a model (or type, or analogy) that would help people understand His own Nature, at least in some degree?

Consider: The created universe is actually a tri-universe of Space, Matter, and Time, each permeating and representing the whole. However, the universe is not partly composed of space, partly of matter, and partly of time (like, for example, the three sides of a triangle). A trinity is not a trio or a triad, but a tri-unity, with each part comprising the whole, yet all three required to make the whole. Thus, the universe is all Space, all Time, and all Matter (including energy as a form of matter); in fact, many scientists speak of it as a Space-Matter-Time continuum.

Furthermore, note the parallels between the divine trinity and the tri-universe in terms of the logical order of its three components. Space is the invisible, omnipresent background of everything in the universe. Matter-and-Energy reveal the reality of the universe. Time makes the universe understandable in the events occurring in it. Note that exactly the same sentence will apply if the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit replace the words, Space, Matter, and Time.

Space itself is also a tri-unity, comprised of three dimensions, with each dimension permeating all space. The reality of any portion of space is obtained by multiplying the three dimensions together (the "mathematics of the Trinity" is not 1+1+1=1, but rather 1x1x1=1). Further, Space is identified in the first dimension seen in the second dimension, experienced in the third dimension. The same sentence could be used with Father, Son, and Spirit replacing first, second, and third dimensions.

Similarly, Time is future, present, and past. The future is the unseen source of time, manifest moment-by-moment in the present and understood in the past. Again substitute Father, Son, and Spirit.

Finally, Matter is unseen, omnipresent Energy, manifesting itself in various forms of measurable motion, then experienced in corresponding phenomena. For example, light energy generates light waves, which are experienced in the seeing of light. Sound energy generates sound waves which we experience when we hear sound.

Thus, the physical universe is a great "trinity of trinities," with the inner relationships of each element modeling the relationships of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. All of this (as cautioned above) does not prove that God is a Trinity, but it certainly is a remarkable fact. It is an amazing effect, which can at least seemingly be explained on the assumption that God is a tri-une God, and has made His creation to reflect Himself. In fact it is very hard to explain any other way.

The above several paragraphs have been quoted mostly from the footnotes supporting Romans 1:20 in The Defender's Study Bible. So far as I know, however, this striking analogy was first recognized by Dr. Nathan H. Wood, former president of Gordon College in his book The Secret of the Universe (Warwick Press, 1932), which included a very laudatory Foreword by Dr. G. Campbell Morgan, one of the greatest British Bible teachers of the early twentieth century. This book was also reprinted by Kregel in 1978, under the title The Trinity in the Universe.

It is therefore a fact that the physical universe is a great trinity of trinities. But how about the universe of life? Many expositors have called attention to the fact that each person is a trinity of body, soul, and spirit. Each of these entities is real and distinct, yet each involves the whole person. The prayer of Paul, in one of his first epistles was this: "And the very God of peace sanctify you wholly; and I pray God your whole spirit and soul and body be preserved blameless unto the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. Faithful is He that calleth you, who also will do it" (I Thessalonians 5:23-24).

The "soul" is that part of the person that is the actual "life" that energizes the "body," which then is the material component that others can see and hear and touch. The classic Old Testament verse relating these two is Leviticus 17:11: ". . . the life of the flesh is in the blood." The Hebrew word for "life" in this verse is the same word as for "soul," and scientists have known for many years that it is the blood's circulation throughout the body that maintains life in the body.

The body's "spirit," on the other hand, is the body's "breath," and this also is essential for maintaining its life (the Hebrew word for "breath" and its New Testament Greek equivalent are each used also for "spirit"). It is sometimes hard to differentiate between soul and spirit for this reason, but the fact that they are different is confirmed especially in Hebrews 4:12, which says that "the word of God is quick, [that is, alive] and powerful [that is, energizing], and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, . . ."

The "spirit" is more than merely the "breath" of the body, however, for the person's spirit somehow is also that entity which partakes of the very image of God. When the first man was yet an inert body formed of the dust of the ground, God "breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul" (Genesis 2:7). Thus "God created man in His own image" (Genesis 1:27). The breath of God thereby became the image of God implanted in man's body of dust and his living soul.

The analogy with the tri-unity of God is fairly obvious. The soul is the life of the body, unseen and intangible but nevertheless the very basis of the person's existence and actions; the body then is the visible and tangible manifestation of the soul. Furthermore the spirit of the person is (like the soul) invisible and intangible but very real in its capacity to interact intelligibly with others, especially with God, including also the ability to make moral and esthetic judgments.

Now animals also possess soul (that is life), body, and spirit (in the sense of breath). They also in a very limited sense seem able to interact with other animals and even human beings on more than a mere instinctive level; however, they cannot, so far as we know, comprehend moral, or spiritual concepts.

To what extent, if any, this animal tri-unity correlated with that of humans in the beginning we do not know. In any case, the entrance of sin and death into the world made drastic changes. Now there is a vast difference. Death comes to both men and animals, and "all turn to dust again." But then it is "the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth" while the spirit of man and "shall return unto God who gave it" (Ecclesiastes 3:20-21; 12:7), consistently with Paul's prayer noted above.

In any case, we can infer that both human life and animal life are actually trinities (three components in the logical trinitarian order with each also pervading the whole). However, the human tri-unity will be restored to live forever whereas animals (body, life, breath) will not. Only men and women are in the image of the eternal God.

Thus, there is a remarkable tri-unity pervading the physical universe, and also one throughout the biological creation. Neither one is perfect, of course. No model can ever be perfect when the original is God Himself. But they are each real trinities. Each unit is distinctive with its own function, and yet all three are necessary components of the whole, and each pervades the whole.

These trinities pervading the creation may not be perfect reflections of the Creator. But they are good and realistic models of the tri-une God who made them.

It would seem there must be some good explanation for this remarkable fact other than coincidence. A plausible explanation would surely seem to be that they were deliberately created by God to help us understand, in at least some small degree, His own tri-une nature.

Introduction to Spheriodicity by Periander Esplana

One of the things that show Biblical Christianity supremely true is its inseparability to total reality.  It is true not only in the realm of the intellectuality but also in the realm of physicality and spirituality.  The perfect balance of its perspective and the absolute preciseness of its equilibrium are amazingly incomparable to any “system” that exists.   

What the head conceives, the heart imagines and the hand moulds in the circularity of Bible truth.  Only the Christian system is real and true, all others are but imitations, counterfeits, and parasites to its spherical realm and periodic functionality.  Only this system can define what is and what is not in triperspectival dimensionality. 

A doxastic reaction of the biblical Christian or believer to spirituality is identical to the unmediated praxis of a knower to secularity.  The believer and the knower cannot be dichotomized in the life of a Christian.  Bible doctrines as evangelically and fundamentally stated are composed of propositions which we claimed to be true.  These asserted and proclaimed true propositions are also collectively declared in the dogmatics, creeds and confessions of faith which reflect the essential beliefs of the community of believers throughout the history. 

There is a definite epistemic ground for these propositions as defended in the Christian apologetics which consists of evidential, presuppositional and verificational systems.  This epistemic justification does not confine itself in the deep recesses of our minds but corresponds firmly in the sublime commitment of our hearts which served as the nontheoretical foundation of all theoretical thoughts.  As the famous words of Blaise Pascal reminds us that the heart has its own reason which the reason itself cannot understand, it is clear that true faith is not irrational but it goes beyond the commonality of beliefs and rationality itself.

The subject-object correlation governed by universal law as applied to a Christian proved that there are adequate reasons to believe in the objectivity of Bible doctrines which are accessibly knowable to the subjectivity of the believer. 

As I have clearly explained in my article entitled “How Do We Know that the King James Bible Is the Perfect Word of God?”, only God’s word itself can only authenticate the word of God.  You cannot ultimately justify the Bible by appealing to extra-biblical authority, facts, experience, intuition, etc.  We can only use such facts and evidences to defend biblical authority within the sphere of biblical presupposition.  The final authority cannot be attested by any other authority. 

The authority of the Bible and the Lordship of Christ are ultimately inseparable.  The Bible (God’s words) is the final standard of truth because of Christ (the Word) who is the Truth.  The argument will always be spherical.  The presuppositional cogency, logical consistency, internal coherence, and factual correspondence of the Bible truth will be known at a certain point by all men because we are all created in the image of God and we lived in the revelational universe which is governed by the richness of God’s common/special grace in His comprehensive/all-encompassing eternal plan in Christ. 

Only a Bible-believing argument is not guilty of a fallacy of circular reasoning.  You know why?  It is simply because only a Bible-believing argument is true and valid in the ultimate sense.  I am calling this presuppositional justification of the belief-system as “spherical argument” since it concerned with the ultimate criterion of a worldview.  I used the word “spheriodicity” to describe this truth as a whole. 

The Bible in all its detail can only be ultimately proven by the Bible itself because the Bible justifies itself.  Sola Scriptura or Scripture Alone is true because the Bible as God’s word is absolutely necessary and it has an absolute authority, sufficiency and perspicuity.

The implausibility of other system can be seen by its ultimate reduction to absurdity.  All other arguments exist only in a borrowed capital from the total sphere of Bible truth.  Unbelieving argument and reasoning in itself is untrue, invalid, fallacious, and self-destructive. 

In my famous article on the Net entitled “The Three Unanswerable Basic Questions for Infidels, Skeptics and Critics,” I pointed out the self-contradicting and self-condemning factors in all infidel’s belief-system.  I have also shown the inherent vicious circularity in all Bible-rejecting arguments: “In any unbelieving argument or reasoning, you must always start with premises which need not to be proved in order for an argument to go on for either they have already been verified to be true or they are merely assumed to be true for the sake of argument. Otherwise, you will be reasoning either in a circle or in infinite regress. However, verification and assumption of a premise have often been determined by the consensus of majority belief, recognized authority, intuition, or empirical experience that may vary from one issue to another producing various opinionated opinions. Proof is needed to show either the truth or the falsity of a particular proposition by using well-known and accepted facts as premises. The fact which is in need of proof in an argument is called the principal fact (factum probandum) while the fact which is being used to establish its truth is called the evidentiary fact (factum probans). Thus, ultimately, all unbelieving argument is guilty not only of the fallacy of circular reasoning but also of the fallacy of begging the question. It commits the fallacy of assumption of an unproved premise (assumptio non probata) because the premises are never proved in an argument for they are assumed to be true. It is guilty of the fallacy of arguing in a circle (circulus in probando) because the conclusion is always implicit in the premises by proving a fact by another fact of the universe in an inferential process. These fallacies are not true with the Bible-believing argument for we never assume the truth of the God of the Bible as though He is merely another fact of the universe. He is the Truth of truths Who needs no evidence or proof for His truth. We need not assumed His truth for we are obligated to believe Him as He is because He is the God of gods and we are His creatures created in His image. He alone can adequately explained all things. Without Him, all things are utterly unrelated and meaningless.”

It is not only true to a specific argument but also to its system in its entirety.  All unbelieving systems are fallaciously and viciously circular.  Rationalism can only be “proven” by a rationalist through rational argument.  Empiricism can only be “proven” by an empiricist through empirical experience.  Subjectivism can only be “proven” by a subjectivist through subjective consciousness.  Mysticism can only be “proven” by a mystic through mystical experience.  Naturalism can only be “proven” by a naturalist through natural phenomena. 

Unlike the Bible truth which is a self-revelation of an infinite-personal triune God Who is there, all unbelieving systems based their “truth” on themselves and nothing beyond themselves.  Their so-called facts are based on pure contingency, hedonistic law, amoral standard, maximum uncertainty, unknown origin, reified chance, anarchic rule, valueless particulars, abstract universal, momentous irrationalism, nihilistic guidelines, ultimate impersonality, tragic relativism, and future despair.   

All Bible-rejecting systems have no power to justify themselves since they all contradict the total reality and reject the God who created the universe.  They are all self-referentially absurd and essentially self-destructive.

God created and preserved all things by His word (Gen.1, 2; Psa.33:1-11; 119; Jn.1:1-14; Ac.17:24-31; Rom.1:16-20; Col.1:15-20; Heb.1:1-3; 11:3; 2Pet.3:1-18; Rev.4:11).  Thus, only God’s word can give meaning and purpose to God’s creation.  The interpretation of the universe by the eternal God’s word precedes the derivative interpretation of the finite man.  Only the Bible can shed light to everything.  Science, philosophy and religion can only exist because of the Bible truth.  Without the word of God, we cannot know at all.  We cannot know who we are, why we are here, where we will go, and what is the world in which we live. We cannot also know the foolishness of other belief-systems and we cannot know God Himself.  Ultimately speaking, without God’s word, we are nothing.

All that we know were derived from the Bible truth: explicit scriptural justification by direct quotation, explicit scriptural justification by logical deduction/induction, implicit scriptural justification by practical application, and implicit scriptural justification by direct implication.  Sola scriptura is spheriodicity in action encapsulated in the Bible Formula which stated that Only the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as Creator, Sustainer and Redeemer at the center and circumference of the Trinity can unlock the secret of the universe, life and man.

“Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.” (John 14:6)

“That their hearts might be comforted, being knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding, to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God, and of the Father, and of Christ; In whom are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge.” (Colossians 2:2,3)